Characterization of Spandex Elastomers
The role of elastomers within the field of polymer science has been and
is one of key importance. Elastomeric materials, and particularly synthetic
elastomers, are virtually indispensable with regard to their myriad industrial,
medical and consumer applications and continue to make up a considerable
portion of annual polymer production and sales.Elastomeric materials based
upon poly(urethane) and/or poly(urethane-urea) chemistry have a rich history,
both in terms of practical application and research. Spandex is a linear,
segmented poly(urethane-urea) elastomer, generally used in fiber form,
first developed in the late 1950s.The spandex elastomers consist of short,
alternating, chemically incompatible hard and soft segments which attempt
to phase separate, but are limited in their ability to do so due to being
covalently bonded to one another. Rather than forming two distinct phases,
these materials exhibit microphase separation in which domains rich in
hard segments form within a matrix rich in soft segments. In addition,
many poly(urethane-urea)s, such as spandex, exhibit bidentate hydrogen
bonding (red dashed lines) in which the oxygen of the urea carbonyl hydrogen
bonds with two groups on a neighboring chain. The level of hydrogen bonding
is substantial enough that the elastomers will degrade before melt processing
becomes possible. For this reason, spandex must be processed from solution.
The
performance characteristics of the spandex elastomer is influenced by such
variables as segment size, hard segment content, choice of hard and soft
segment chemistry, degree of microphase separation, and a variety of processing
variables.Throughout the history of spandex, it has been found that poly(tetramethylene
ether glycol) has been the most advantageous choice of soft segment. Recent
advances in catalyst technology has led to the development of ultra-low
monol content poly(propylene glycol), which shows great promise for use
as a spandex soft segment. Ultra-low monol content PPG offers substantial
advantages over PTMEG including lower cost of materials, improved process
economics, enhanced environmental aspects, and elastomer performance characteristics.
The goal of this study is to conduct structure-property characterization
of these PPG-based spandex elastomers in an attempt to gain insight into
how chemical composition and processing influence the morphological structure
of the elastomers. Coupling this knowledge with determination of the macroscopic
properties of the elastomers will enable the development of improved PPG-based
spandex elastomers which may challenge conventional PTMEG-based elastomers.
A variety of rheo-optic, microscopy, thermal, and mechanical characterization
techniques were used in this study.
Small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) is useful technique which can reveal
the average distance between the hard domain islands in the matrix of soft
segments, as well as provide an approximation of the thickness of the interphase
region between the hard and soft domains.Additionally, SAXS can provide
an approximation of the degree of mixing of the soft and hard segments
within the hard and soft domains. The figure below shows how SAXS may be
used to determine the average spacing between the hard domains in spandex
systems using either 2000 g/mol ultra-low monol PPG and 2000 g/mol PTMEG
for soft segments. It was seen that for identical molecular weights PTMEG
had a slightly greater interdomain spacing, which is consistent with the
fact that PTMEG has about 35% more backbone bonds than PPG for comparable
molecular weights.
Where small angle x-ray scattering provided essentially
an numeric representation of the microphase separation characteristics,
use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) allows for the presentation of visual
images of the microphase separation characteristics of the spandex elastomers
at the surface.Using tapping mode atomic force microscopy and a technique
known as phase imaging, it is possible to resolve a surface into regions
of hard and soft material.Shown below are a pair of AFM phase image micrographs,
where the lighter regions corresponds to hard domain material.The left
image is that of a PTMEG-based spandex material, and the image on the right
is that of a PPG-based spandex material, with comparable soft segment molecular
weights.

As can be seen, the PPG-based material has a finer
grain structure of the light colored hard domains within the darker soft
domain matrix. Atomic force microscopy dramatically revealed changes in
the surface morphology of thin spandex films as the level of a low molecular
soft segment component, tri(propylene glycol), was added to the formulation.
From left to right in the three AFM images shown below, the amount of TPG
is increasing, lowering the average soft segment molecular weight. What
is seen, is that as the amount of TPG increases, the size and amount of
the hard domains also increases, implying that TPG is acting more as a
hard segment component than as a soft segment component as originally suspected.

A variety of thermo-mechanical characterization
methods have also been applied to the spandex materials, but will not be
discussed in detail in this brief report. These include dynamic mechanical
analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and conventional Instron tensile
strength measurements.